Stolen Private Videos

Home > Spy Cams porn sites > Stolen Private Videos | Jump to: Review > Screenshots

Stolen Private Videos review

Site niche info

Primary Category: Spy Cams
This site The third best Spy Cams
Other Category: AmateurVideo


Trial: 0.95 $ (1 days recurring)
3 Month: 74.95 $ (90 days recurring)
Monthly: 29.95 $ (30 days recurring)


Content Quality
16 / 20  
Amount of Content
12 / 20  
8 / 15  
Site Design and navigation
11 / 15  
8 / 15  
15 / 15  
Other Review Rating
n/a / 10 (0 sites)
70 Good

Review porn site: Stolen Private Videos

Here comes another one for all the people addicted to homemade goodies – what we will be looking at tonight is a site called Stolen Private Videos offering you a seemingly good deal of amateur movies supplied by horny bastards sending in their girlfriends' and ex-girlfriends' stuff just to show what them hoochies are up to in bed. There are both softcore and hardcore movies here, as far as I see, and all of them feature no one but real rookies. Well, at least I don't see any familiar faces on the free tour pages of this one.

On the other hand, there is one thing that drives me a little bit worried. A couple of the scenes, the trailers from which are presented on the front page of the described adult site, are shot in one and the same room and even on one and the same bed though they feature two different girls. Does it mean that they are simply shot by one and the same damn lucky guy or does it mean that the content here at this site is not at real as it's said to be? Yeah, you know where I'm heading, right? :) As usual, the only way to answer the above question of mine is by checking out the insides of this site's Members area!

Hey, unfortunately, I'm up with slightly more disappointing news than what I suspected I would come up with here. No, they don't have anything to do with the amount of content at Stolen Private Videos – at least don't have anything to do with it yet. The part that really disappointed me was the Updates section in the Members area. turns out to be a site with one of the shortest updating histories ever – it was launched on May 21st, 2010 and all the updating suddenly stopped on its pages on May 31st, 2010. 10 days of updates. That's laughable.

The collection of content at this XXX resource matches its updating schedule just fine. What I see inside the Videos section are 58 movies, some of which are not even full-time! The Photos section is even smaller – there are 56 pic galleries here and that bad part is that one and the same girl can appear in several of them at once. Besides, have you ever seen amateur homemade photo galleries with over a hundred pics in each? Come on, gimme a break! It's all staged and it's kinda lacking the passion that I expect from every homemade site that I get to.

And what about the quality of vids and pics here? Well, the videos are a little too good for a homemade porn collection – their frame size of 1920x1080Px and their bitrate of above 3500Kbps make me wonder, you know. Still, the blurred image and shaking hands of the cameraman point at the opposite. And what about the pictures? The resolution of 1024x576Px and questionable quality allows the owners of this resource to pass them for homemade too, alright.

One way or another, I wouldn't call the main collection of this porn website too impressing. Has this site got something else to offer you apart from its outdated small archive of content of questionable exclusiveness and quality? Hell yeah, it has. Almost 3,000 streamline porn DVDs in all imaginable niches, tons of separate porn video feeds – both straight and gay, tons of adult games and a sufficient library of erotic stories. All this stuff will keep you busy for ages – if you are okay with its rather low quality, of course. :)

Frankly speaking, if Stolen Home Videos didn't have that huge archive of free goodies offered to all of its members, I would never call it a good one. In fact, I would just devastate it in this review of mine cause it's definitely not good enough when taken on its own. Bonuses surely add value to it – a lot of value but... There's still enough stuff I would change in this one.


screenshot 1 (2010-12-07)
Screenshot #1 (2010-12-07)
screenshot 2 (2010-12-07)
Screenshot #2 (2010-12-07)