Low Art Films

Home > Video porn sites > Low Art Films | Jump to:  Video > Review > Screenshots

Low Art Films review

Site niche info

Primary Category: Video
This site in the top twenty Video
Other Category: Porn StarsHardcore

Price

Trial: 2.95 $ (3 days recurring)
Monthly: 14.95 $ (30 days recurring)
3 Month: 34.95 $ (90 days recurring)

Scores

Content Quality
18 / 20  
Amount of Content
8 / 20  
Updates
14 / 15  
Site Design and navigation
12 / 15  
Originality
12 / 15  
Extras
2 / 15  
Other Review Rating
8 / 10 (6 sites)
SCORE:
66 Good

Video

Review porn site: Low Art Films

Reviewing porn sites is not always that much of an easy thing, that's for sure – and today's review is exactly the case. Now, it's not that that site under review is bad or something – it's totally terrific and all. It's just that the information about it wasn't that easy to gather. The About section was not working, so I had to rely on my impressions and… Here's what I can tell here. Low Art Films (this is how this site is called) is a hardcore resource – though a hardcore resource with that "art" bit in it, that's for sure. The movies and pics here all sport fairly high quality, gorgeous settings – and even better actors. It's all about top-notch porn stars here – the ones like Tory Lane, Sasha Grey, Jayden James getting fucked by such studs as Chris Johnson, Ralph Long, et cetera. Not that bad at all, eh? I also like the scenes themselves – they are totally… Artful, if that's the word. I know that it has already been repeated quite a few times in this short paragraph but that's the first epithet that comes into your head when you see the XXX website under my scrutiny. :) Just can't help it. :)

I can't call the collection of this resource a really huge one – at the moment there are 37 movies and only 1 scene published under "Photosets". But don't worry, my dear still art lovers – the thing is that every full scene at this XXX resource is actually backed up with a picture gallery of fairly fine quality. Yeah, these are not plain screencaps but full-size images and they are also very plentiful. Anyway, the size of this one leaves much to be desired from the first sight – hope that the Updates section will tell me why.

Oh well, it's not that the reviewed paysite was launched only yesterday – the oldest of this source's scenes date back to summer 2010, which means that it has been on the market for quite a few months already. And what about the schedule of updates? the analyzed XXX site turns out to be a weekly updated resource. That's not too fast but anything but slow either – fairly good average pace, I would say. However, it will definitely take this site's owners quite some time to turn their XXX collection into a really huge one.

Maybe they put much more emphasis on content quality? Well, yeah, the pics and videos supplied by this one are fairly good. The former have the resolution of 1620x1080Px and the latter – the frame size of 720x400Px and the bitrate of 2090Kbps. These are the showings high enough to earn the "almost-highest" rating for this site at our site – but they are still not high enough by today's standards, for sure.

I had been reviewing this site, throwing impatient glances at the "Jump to bonus site" in the top left-hand corner of the page, hoping to dive into a real ocean of bonuses that would have made me forget about the not-so-perfect nature of lowartfilms.com. Unfortunately, I could not – the only "bonus site" that was there in the dropdown listing was the analyzed source itself. Come on, man, that's not funny already! This site looks as flashy and tempting as some premium HD porn must-see – but it is not, no offence to its owners and gorgeous stars! Damn, that's nasty…

You know, I feel kind of cheated here – and kind of puzzled, in fact. You know, the analyzed website actually looks totally terrific even though it is not. Its HD looks are exactly what misled me, making me drool all over this resource and its sexy porn stars. However, now I see that its small collection, medium-quality content and absolute lack of bonuses shouldn't have excited me that much. What a pity.

Screenshots

screenshot 1 (2011-03-04)
Screenshot #1 (2011-03-04)
screenshot 2 (2011-03-04)
Screenshot #2 (2011-03-04)

Outside reviews

Thepaysites
7
2015-04-22
Porn Inspector
6
2015-04-01
Honest porn reviews
8
2014-09-02
Porn adept
8
2012-12-11
All HD Review
9
2011-11-06
FreeOnes Reviews
8
2011-07-01