Looker girls porn review
12 / 20
Amount of Content
8 / 20
2 / 15
Site Design and navigation
11 / 15
11 / 15
2 / 15
Other Review Rating
7 / 10 (2 sites)
Review porn site: Looker girls
The index page of this site turned out to be considerably more disappointing than that warning, unfortunately. No, the girls didn’t get any less tempting – they kept on blazing like the brightest stars. However… Say, can anybody explain what the fuck is the announcement of Looker’s November ’03 issue doing on the index page of its official website? Man, I will be very very disappointed if a closer look at the insides of this site shows that it hasn’t been updated for 6 and a half years in a row already! Damn, I can’t say that I’m entering the Members area of lookergirls.com with too much good emotion – but my rage definitely does add to my eagerness to see it.
Okay, I’m glad to announce that November ’03 issue of Looker mag was not the last one in this edition’s history. However, I think I have got bad news for you as well – the point is that the development of this magazine still stopped shortly. The freshest issue that I can find here in its digital form dates back to March ’05 – and there were absolutely no additions to the site’s archive made since then. Well, it sucks that such an awesome porn mag no longer exists – but is it actually that good that its digital version is still out there on the Net?
The collection of this website comprises as few as 10 issues of Looker mag. Yeah, this doesn’t seem to be very impressing from the start, that’s for sure – but let’s make some simple calculations here, homie. Each of those 10 issues features about a dozen hot models (sometimes up to 15, as far as I can see) – and each of those models will offer you a full-size photo gallery showing her stripping and playing with herself. What does it make in total? From 120 to 150 photo scenes plus a bunch of vids from five or six exceptionally adventurous girls… Hmm, this is already not that bad – at least not as bad as I thought it would be.
The quality of all this stuff leaves much to be desired, however – or am I being too picky? Frankly speaking, I didn’t do much porn back in 2005, so I don’t quite remember what it looked like back then – maybe 1200x800Px photos and 640x480Px at 460Kbps movies were then similar to what we call “HD content” these days? Alright, guess I’d better stop pretending cause I’m not so good at it – even if 1200x800Px pics were alright at that time, the movies could have definitely been better.
Any extras here? Not this time, buddy – at this paysite you will have to content yourself with those 10 mag issues and several videos only. Well, I say again – this is still not that bad and it surely can keep you busy for a month or so. Thus, my first and foremost recommendation to you will be the following: if you decide to give this source a try, don’t spend more than the cost of the 1-month membership on it – in the opposite case you are very likely to regret throwing away so much cabbage. Damn, and even with that I can’t say that this site is a bad one – am I getting old and weak or something? :) Okay then – let me be weak by saying that I quite liked this resource – mostly for its spirit but definitely not for its objective advantages… That’s it, guys! Fin.
Monthly: 19.99 $ (30 days recurring)
3 Month: 29.99 $ (90 days recurring)