Lonnie Waters

Home > Solo Models porn sites > Lonnie Waters | Jump to: Review > Screenshots > Pictures

Lonnie Waters review

Site niche info

Primary Category: Solo Models
This site in thirty of the best Solo Models
Other Category: BlondesBig tits

Price

Monthly: 24.95 $ (30 days recurring)
3 month: 59.95 $ (90 days recurring)
6 month: 99.95 $ (180 days non-recurring)



Payment options:  By Phone, Credit Cards, Online Check
Billing:  CCBill, Epoch, GXBilling
Prechecked sales:  no

Site Facts

Videos
Average length:6min
Number of movies: 11
Video formats:
  • WMV, 1740 kb/s 720x480
  • WMV, 604 kb/s 320x240
Full length videos:yes
Streaming:yes
HD video:no
Pictures
Pic sets: 82
Pics per set:95
Pics Resolution:2000x1333
High Res pictures:yes
Zip sets:yes
Watermarks:yes
Additionally
Model Index:no
Bonus Sites:yes (2 sites)
Vid caps:no
Live chat:no
Message board:no

Pros and Cons

Pros
+ hot model
+ loads of free bonuses
+ decent photo quality
Cons
- tiny video collection
- no updates
- poor design and navigation
- low video quality

Scores

Content Quality
15 / 20  
Amount of Content
6 / 20  
Updates
2 / 15  
Site Design and navigation
6 / 15  
Originality
9 / 15  
Extras
12 / 15  
Other Review Rating
4 / 10 (3 sites)
SCORE:
50 Average

Review porn site: Lonnie Waters

About site

From the first sight Lonnie Waters looks like a typical SoCal blue-eyed blondie that you can picture chilling at the beach by the ocean in her skimpy bikini. However, she’s way naughtier than most California girls – and we are here to prove it by reviewing her personal XXX site right here and right now! Not only will we see what she hides under bikini – we will also get to see all of her lesbian sex feats and her kinky games with her XXL rubber friends. Sounds promising, huh?

Free tour

The free tour at this blond doll’s site is not the most promising I have ever seen, however. I don’t mean to offend Lonnie herself or anything but… That website of hers looks totally outdated, unfortunately. Let’s start with the fact that its front page says she is 21 years old while I’m pretty sure she was born in 1983. Does that mean that her resource is 8 years too old already? Whew, that would be so bad. But let’s slide inside its Members area and see – just to avoid hasty conclusions and stuff.

Amount of Content

The size of this honey’s content collection is not too stunning – but also not too bad for a personal porn site, that’s without a doubt. All in all, Lonnie can offer you 82 picture galleries, a bundle of wallpapers and 11 videos. Yeah, right, the latter showing really leaves much to be desired but… Hey, she is a softcore model after all – her stuff is supposed to be exposed on pictures and not on movies most of the time.

Content Quality

Looking at the quality of the videos that Lonnie offers, I think that her site might easily turn out to be exactly THAT outdated after all. The best I have found so far was a 720x480Px at 1740Kbps flick while 320x240Px ones are also not really rare. Damn, that’s plain terrible. Surprisingly, the pics are not really that bad – even though they do look retro sometimes, they have decent resolution of 2000x1333Px and are clear enough to be enjoyable.

Updates

It looks like the owners of this one are a bit ashamed of how old it is – that’s probably why all dates of updates are hidden away inside the Members area. The only ones that are left are stated inside the Top Rated Pictures section but… Since they state only the day and the month when they were published, I can only imagine what year they date back to. Okay, whatever, let it be one of lonniewaters.com’s little secrets – a not really pleasant one, unfortunately.

Bonuses

Even though the situation with this site starts looking a bit hopeless already, I know of something that might make you feel at least a little bit better about it. The bonuses! I know that this site itself is hardly worth the admission fee but… What would you say about 17 more? 15 of them are personal sites of other models (most of them are also outdated, unfortunately) and the remaining two are absolutely enormous mega sites – one focusing on XXX debuts of amateur girls and the other – on porn experiments of mouthwatering glam models. Yeah, these two are cool

Usability

The design and the navigation system used by this blondie’s personal resource are also far not the coolest you can get on the net. The only thing that really saves it is the fact that its collection is small, which makes it easy to navigate no matter what. However, the selection of tools that help you enjoy it all to the maximum definitely is scarce here.

Conclusion

Even though Lonnie is such a beauty, I still won’t recommend you to rely on her too much. Yes, she is hot – but her site is not. Those content quality issues, terribly old pics and videos, that ancient design and a navigation system to match it… All that is not cool. The selection of bonuses might change it for the better – but only for porn omnivores who are not looking for some particular girl or some particular type of XXX action cause the list of porn niches they cover is a bit too long and diverse.

Screenshots

screenshot 1 (2012-09-05)
index of member zone (2012-09-05)
screenshot 2 (2012-09-05)
pictures - solo (2012-09-05)
screenshot 3 (2012-09-05)
pics gallery (2012-09-05)
screenshot 4 (2012-09-05)
videos (2012-09-05)

Picture Samples

Outside reviews

Porn Inspector
5
2015-11-23
Thepaysites
0
2015-01-17
Porn castle
7
2013-10-22