Digi Dolls - site blocked

Home > Porn Stars > Digi Dolls site info

Digi Dolls was suspended

Digi Dolls site blocked Review date: 2012-08-28
  • Monthly: 29.95 $ (30 days recurring)
  • 3 month: 59.95 $ (90 days recurring)
  • 6 month: 99.95 $ (180 days non-recurring)
  • We recommend do not register at Digi Dolls because it is not safe for you

    About site

    In spite of not being the newest one out there, Digi Dolls still remains a true must-see when it comes to classy sensual erotica and lesbian porn. It can boast quite a lineup of models too – it focuses mostly of gorgeous models of the past – such as matchless Puma Swede, Crissy Moran, Gina Lynn and the like. Shown on pics and videos of fairly decent quality, these dreamboat babes are very likely to blow you away. Now read on – and I will strip this site off and let you scrutinize it from all angles like you do it with its stars. ;)

    Free tour

    Frankly speaking, I’m not 100% satisfied with the way the free tour pages of this site look. First of all, let’s start with the layout of the page itself – that narrow strip of content obviously not intended for up-to-date widescreen monitors. It looks alarming these days, suggesting that the site under review is far not the freshest one can get. The same with the updates, one of the most recent of which is said to feature Crissy Moran. Come on, she quit porn in, like, 2006! You just can’t ignore it and put her stuff out as fresh. That’s bad!

    Amount of Content

    Wow… Now that’s what I call a monstrous collection of porn! Unfortunately, I don’t think I’ll be able to tell you much about its size cause its navigation system just sucks but here’s as far as I can go. This resource features 656 girls ranging from super-famous porn stars to barely legal amateurs – and shows each of them in 1 to several dozens of scenes. Damn, this site is anything but easy to navigate – but when you get to surfing through its endless labyrinths of content, there’s just no stopping you!

    Content Quality

    But don’t get overexcited yet – the fact that this site is obviously outdated shows oh so vividly when you look at the quality of content that it supplies. I have just downloaded three super-hot vids for myself and while two of them turned out to be relatively decent 700x394Px at 1640Kbps ones, the third was a totally laughable tiny 320x240Px at 765Kbps clip. I was luckier with the pics, however – whatever I was laying my hands on was golden. 1600x1066Px… That’s very decent for an almost vintage porn site.


    Today’s date on the front page of digidolls.com is a cheat, unfortunately – according to the listing of the latest updates, the last time something new made it here was back in May 2010. Besides, now I’m 100% sure that it’s not exclusive – I took a closer look at the watermarks on the pics and they turned out to belong to Glamour Models Gone Bad – one of porn sites I have gotten to review lately. Damn, I’m already growing tired of all the cheating and inconvenience here.


    It seems to me that there are no bonuses at this site – at least, there is no mention of extra paysite access offers or whatsoever on free tour or Members area pages. On one hand, this site doesn’t really need bonuses cause it’s so huge by itself but… Frankly speaking, I already feel an urgent need to run away from this totally messed up pile of non-exclusive old porn for at least a while. Bonus sites would have come in handy here!


    The navigation system at this site is one of the worst things that have ever happened to me. I was completely unable to estimate the amount of scenes available here cause the only type of navigation you can do is by the name of the model. You never know how many vids or pictures this or that of them offers until you actually see her profile/personal page. That would have taken me weeks to count it all up! And it goes beyond that here, in fact – every navigation feature that you run into seems like it’s meant to make your life harder.


    I know that many porn surfers would really like it here at this site – all thanks to its absolutely outstanding size. I, however, am not so impressed. Everything that lies in front of you here is so outdated, of such low quality, so flagrantly non-exclusive… I don’t usually let cheaters get away too easily in my reviews so… Don’t even ask me for a good rating here. This site, as for me, is not worth your attention.