All fits in

Home > Toys porn sites > All fits in | Jump to: Review > Screenshots

All fits in review

Site niche info

Primary Category: Toys
This site in the top ten Toys
Other Category: no other categories


Monthly: 24.95 $ (30 days recurring)


Content Quality
20 / 20  
Amount of Content
8 / 20  
9 / 15  
Site Design and navigation
12 / 15  
12 / 15  
12 / 15  
Other Review Rating
8 / 10 (1 sites)
73 Very Good

Review porn site: All fits in

If you think that the stretching potential of ladies’ pussies is limited, just check All Fits In out – this hot site will make you change your mind in a blink of an eye! The ones featured at it are a bunch of raunchy European girls of different age, complexion and body size. The only thing that unites them all is their addiction to extreme penetrations! There seems to be a touch of food fetish too cause the objects that these hoochies stuff up their twats most often come from the fridge. Eggs, celery stalks, pears, huge cucumbers – the stars of the described source gladly use it all to please themselves along with other nice-sized objects. Hey, hope you will also be glad to hear that some of them love testing the tightness of their assholes either! ;)

Another thing I simply can’t avoid pointing out is the seemingly blameless quality of content at this adult source. All teasers are crystal-clear and seemingly very fresh, there are no faces from the past and the promises made on the free tour pages are appealing either… Okay, let’s cum in and see if all this is for real!

Holy crap, looks like the range of objects used by the stars of this site is considerably wider than I had expected. Flashlights, plastic pipes, cream and shampoo tubes – all this really does fit into the squelching snatches and bungholes of the bitches featured here! This site surely can’t be blamed for being dull – each of its 36 movies and 145 picture galleries is a fuckin’ masterpiece different from all the others. Hey, are you stunned by the huge gap between the sizes of the movie archive and the photo one? I am too – and so far I haven’t managed to understand why they are so different from each other.

The quality of content is another thing that this XXX site can really be praised for – its 640x480Px at 2000Kbps videos are guaranteed to let you see everything you want to see – every fucking millimeter of those bitches’ holes getting stretched into gaping in front of your very eyes. 3000x2000Px pics are good too – but they look a little too blurred as if someone took images with considerably smaller resolution and zoomed them in. Hmm, if this is the thing that was actually done here, it sucks. Anyway, it doesn’t mean that the photos here are not watchable – they are still damn great – after all, your image viewer software will still resize them to match your screen!

Anything else you would like to know about this porn website? Oh, updates! I knew you were going to ask about them :) Well, the schedule of updates is quite alright here either – even though not perfect, I’d say. New episodes appear here once in every 5 to 10 days and… Hey, what are the owners of this site thinking about? Why not simply make those updates weekly, huh?

The bonuses? Well, this is where the situation gets a little bit strange. See, the analyzed adult website is a part of a network that is mostly dedicated to busty matures – 7 out of 9 sites comprising it belong to this niche. I don’t think that this stuff will be of any interest to you – but the 9th site called Twat Crew and featuring a good deal of teens might be worth taking a look at.

Anyway, that stuff with the bonuses surely ain’t gonna change my totally positive perception of This site is great, it is exclusive, it shows a bunch of raunchy babes in real dirty hole-stretching action and it supplies a good deal of content of fairly fine quality. Oh yeah, it does get updated often too! Is there anything else it shall have in order to deserve being called a premium one? I don’t think so!


screenshot 1 (2010-02-11)
Screenshot #1 (2010-02-11)
screenshot 2 (2010-02-11)
Screenshot #2 (2010-02-11)

Outside reviews